Typically, the rate at which politicians have moved to build regulatory frameworks addressing artificial knowledge morality is an indicator that they attach significant value to these regulations. Most particularly, on May 17, 2024, the Council of Europe ratified the Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law. An empty international agreement, it refers to a commitment that AI will be in keeping with human rights and political ideals. Most interestingly, some places, particularly the United States, the United Kingdom, and the European Union, adhered to this, signifying a move toward global rules over AI.
Regulatory tactics in the United States have, nevertheless, witnessed remarkable pendulum swings. President Donald Trump, on 20 January 2025, revoked the Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence executive order because too much rules, he averred, snuffed out imagination and promoted ideologically driven rules. Alternatively, a new was issued on January 23, 2025, placing emphasis on economical profitability, as well as protection. Given these quickly contrasting regulatory frameworks, one can see the different arguments between governing AI and allowing for its unrestrained growth.