The US businessman technology entrepreneur Marc Andreessen called it at 2.16 p.m. California time next Sunday. ” DeepSeek R1 is AI’s Sputnik time”, he posted on X.
A Chinese business, operating since 2023 and helmed by a young scientist, had unveiled a new robot that seemed to close the achievement of America’s leading designs at a fraction of the cost.
Never mind that Chinese Communist Party (CCP ) censors curbed its answers on everything, including the status of Taiwan, to the 1989 massacre in Tiananmen Square. It was like the Soviet Union launched the initial satellite into orbit in 1957, shocking America, to Andreessen, a veteran of generations of booms and busts in technology.
Shares in several of the biggest companies in the world fell the following day, including Nvidia, the biggest company to lose nearly$ 600 billion in US market history. Investors feared that DeepSeek’s success would mean China would no longer need so many American chips, that US supremacy in AI was in danger or already over, and that Silicon Valley giants, who had just one week earlier announced a$ 500 billion AI investment plan, were spending much more money than they needed. According to the Chinese AI laboratory, the training cost for one of its foundation models was only$ 5. 6 million.
As people frantically searched for answers on Apple’s game stores in the US and UK for the first time since ‘s launch in November 2022, DeepSeek’s application, with its cheery orange whale logo, became the most popular free app there.
However, was the largest authoritarian nation in the world about to surpass the north in terms of AI? What does it imply for the government to be in charge of a technology that is feared to be used erroneously in cyberattacks, natural weapons production, and thought control? Where did the US hope to stay supreme by preventing China’s development by imposing export bans on microchips, which are essential to progress, given that AI is now widely accepted as one of the main playing fields of political competition?
Numbness had been rumbling out of DeepSeek’s experiment in Hangzhou, inside Shanghai, for a while. Some authorities had been silently impressed by the innovations overseen by DeepSeek’s manager, Liang Wenfeng, a 40-year-old wall fund investor. However, it wasn’t until last Wednesday that a real disaster struck. The company published opening the DeepSeek R1 design, boasting of “powerful and interesting reasoning behaviours” and saying it is comparable to Start AI’s 01 model, and also better in some areas.
While Google, Meta and usually swaddle their new releases in marketing hype, DeepSeek’s matter-of-fact view was evident from the soporific name of its announcement:” Incentivizing Logic Ability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning”.
The design was free to use and it seemed pioneer in the way it was engineered to be more effective than ChatGPT-o1, OpenAI’s$ 20-a-month logic design. Because it was designed to only activate the relevant component of the system in response to the query, it only used less computing power. Performances that cost other businesses billions appeared to be affordable for millions.
In response, OpenAI , o3-Mini, on Friday that will be made available to all users, including people on ChatGPT’s free tier.
Liang’s team’s creation upended not just markets, but also the geopolitical calculus between the US and China as they vied for supremacy in AI with all of its economic, political, and military potentials, according to reports that he was on vacation for Lunar New Year. Around the world, experts pondered how the Chinese had made necessity the mother of invention and discovered a way to avenge a shortage of chips.
Jimmy Goodrich, an adviser on technology to the Rand Corporation, told Reuters:” It’s been long known that DeepSeek has a really good team, and if they had access to even more compute, God knows how capable they would be”.
” I confess I hadn’t heard of them”, said Michael Wooldridge, a professor of the foundations of AI at the University of Oxford. “]They ] appear to have built something which is as capable as a GPT class model, not necessarily better, with something like a hundredth of the resources”.
He claims that the development “pulls the rug out from under Nvidia,” making it “much more accessible technology” for a much larger number of developers to create AI models.
Forrester Research principal analyst Mike Gualtieri believes that more startups will be able to develop their own AI models as a result of accessibility. But also, the bigger US tech players, with their considerable data processing firepower, could accelerate their own development.
” The companies that already have a lot of chips, or access to them – the OpenAIs and the Googles– once they apply these]DeepSeek ] techniques, they can experiment more rapidly”, he said.
In London, hopes and fears were in conflict. Peter Kyle, the technology secretary, assured him he would not download the Chinese app because he was aware that any information he typed in or uploaded would be stored there and that all Chinese companies are required to” support, assist, and cooperate” with intelligence efforts under the national intelligence law.
But, as a minister tasked with using AI to deliver economic growth, he was “really excited” by the breakthrough. It appeared to demonstrate that skills were more crucial than previously believed in achieving significant AI breakthroughs, which was encouraging for the research-heavy UK tech economy.
After the data protection authority demanded assurances about what personal data is collected, DeepSeek vanished from Italian app stores for Google and Apple devices midway through the week. The Dublin Data Protection Commission also demanded answers from DeepSeek regarding the “data processing conducted in relation to data subjects in Ireland.”
The arrival of DeepSeek was like a needle scratching a record in the US, where Donald Trump signed to” solidify ] the US position as the leader in AI.” Trump referred to it as a “wake-up call for our industries that we need to be relentlessly focused on competing to succeed.” Or as one X user parsed his message:” Get back in the code mines”.
It didn’t take long for suspicions to take hold. David Sacks, the White House AI adviser, said:” There’s substantial evidence that what DeepSeek did here is they distilled knowledge out of OpenAI models, and I don’t think OpenAI is very happy about this”.
OpenAI’s founder, Sam Altman, said he thought it was “legit invigorating to have a new competitor”. Then, a day later, his company stated that it was “reviewing indications that DeepSeek may have improperly distilled our models.”
DeepSeek’s decision to censor itself in real time was also made clear when it became clear that the CCP might find its responses to be troubling or politically embarrassing. One user in Brazil described how DeepSeek began to consider issues like Beijing’s crackdown on protests in Hong Kong, the “persecution of human rights lawyers,” the “censorship of discussions on Xianjiang re-education camps,” and China’s” social credit system punishing dissenters.”
Then, when it speculated that “in China, the primary threat is the state itself, which actively suppresses dissent,” the entire screed of” thinking” was deleted, and DeepSeek unwaveringly asked the user if he wouldn’t mind talking about math or logic problems in its place.
Users could see the CCP’s impact on free speech and what the chatbot actually thought, but it was unintentionally subversive to see it all in action.
The strange world of AI grew more bizarre and the stakes soared higher.